Direct answer
The episode summary understands the phrase in relation to the number of females in the overall inheritance framework, as a mathematical rule linking the male’s share to that number. This is a description attributed to Shahrur in the episode summary, not a documented verbatim text from the episode yet.
What is attributed to Shahrur
The summary of episode 26 states that Shahrur interprets the phrase as a mathematical rule making the male’s share dependent on the number of females in the overall inheritance framework. This page goes no further than that; the episode text or a verbatim quotation showing the method of calculation or its conditions is not available here.
Atlas explanation
The summary understands the phrase in relation to the number of females in the overall inheritance framework. This explains how the claim is presented in the source, rather than establishing a detailed mathematical formula.
Qualified conclusion
If the episode text is confirmed on review, its central claim is the linking of the male’s share to the number of females in the overall inheritance framework. As for saying that this establishes a general standard covering multiple numerical configurations, that requires the episode text and its context, or a specific passage from Shahrur’s books.
Open question and page limits
Which inheritance configurations does this linkage mean? What equation does it use? And does it present it as an interpretation of all inheritance cases or only some of them? The available material does not settle these questions. It is necessary to return to the original episode, while reviewing the existing book links: Towards New Foundations for Islamic Jurisprudence and The Mother of the Book and Its Elaboration.