What does the claim say here?
The summary does not establish a detailed definition of Islam, but it highlights its connection to a set of human values. The available evidence establishes no more than this general connection and the examples mentioned alongside it.
What is attributed to Shahrur
The available evidence summarizes the attribution by linking Islam to values including truthfulness, justice, not taking life, and giving full measure and weight, while stating that people do not differ over these values in any parliament or civil society. The source for this attribution is the summary of Episode 14, not a verified verbatim text from it.
Atlas explanation
For the purposes of the Atlas explanation, this connection may be understood as highlighting the value-based dimension of the claim. However, it explains the scope of the summary; it is not an independent, definitive definition of the term Islam or a judgment on everyone who adheres to these values.
Qualified conclusion
If the attribution is established from the original episode, it helps explain why the presentation connects Islam with values shared among human beings. However, the available evidence in this atom does not establish moving from that to assigning a specific religious status to any person.
Open question and limits of the evidence
What exactly did Shahrur say in the episode, and what was the context of his discussion of these values? The attached evidence contains no raw material or verbatim quotation. Nor does the summary determine whether the examples mentioned are exhaustive of the intended values, or establish that people actually agree on them.