What is meant

Shahrur sees that religion, in its contemporary sense, does not in any way conflict with the requirements of civil society That is, religiosity does not necessarily impose a form of rule or authority that contradicts the establishment of a modern civil society

The atom’s structure in the atlas

  • Type of argument: political
  • Direction of the argument: denying any contradiction between contemporary religion and the requirements of civil society.
  • Central terms: religion, contemporary, civil society, authority, rule.
  • Degree of centrality: central.

This gives religion a position that is not confrontational with the civil state, and separates religiosity from imposing a specific model of governance; in doing so, it opens the way for religion to coexist with legal and political pluralism.

Support

  • Supporting text: «“Religion, in our contemporary understanding, does not in any way contradict the requirements of civil society”».

Location of support in the book

  • Book: Religion and Authority.
  • Location: in the first section of the book, within the discussion of the relationship between religion and civil society.
  • Type of support: proximate evidence.
  • Marker for verification: does not in any way contradict the requirements of civil society
  • Reading note: this location is suitable as evidence because it explicitly states that religion does not contradict the requirements of civil society.

Degree of documentation

  • Level: directly documented
  • Meaning of the level: the atom is based on an explicit witness close to the wording of the claim.
  • Limits of reading: the wording above is an analytical summary, and should not be treated as a verbatim quotation unless the witness is transmitted textually.

Its function in the book

Its function here is argumentative; it supports a larger conclusion in the chapter or prepares for it.

Editorial note

This atom is among the most important atoms linking religion to the civil state.