The intended meaning

Shahrur divides obscenities into forbidden sexual relations that take multiple forms, between private and public For him, they are of two kinds: instinctive obscenity, and acquired deviant obscenity such as sodomy He treats zina as a public obscenity that is established only by witnesses

The structure of the atom in the atlas

  • Type of argument: legislative
  • Movement of the argument: it divides obscenities into types and treats zina as a public obscenity.
  • Key terms: obscenities, zina, witnesses, publicity.
  • Degree of centrality: central.

It fixes the meaning of obscenity through its internal division and links type, ruling, and proof, which helps in reading moral and practical boundaries in a non-uniform way.

Grounding

  • Supporting text: «الفواحش نوعان: غريزية (كناح الذكر للأنثى ضمن العقد المشروع أو المخالفة له) وانحرافية مكتسبة (كاللواط)، والزنا هو الفاحشة العلنية المثبتة بالشهود».

Degree of documentation

  • Level: structurally documented
  • Meaning of the level: the atom is based on more than one witness or on a clear structure of closely related expressions.
  • Reason for classification: the witnesses state the multiplicity of obscenities and their clear division.
  • Limits of the reading: the formulation above is an analytical summary and should not be treated as a verbatim quotation unless the witness is quoted verbatim.

Its function in the book

Its function here is definitional; it fixes a meaning or conceptual distinction that Shahrur relies on in building the idea.

Editorial note

What is meant here is the distribution of rulings across different forms of behavior.