The thesis of the Book revolves around the idea that terrorism does not arise from the essence of Islam, but from a closed traditional reading that turned the text into an instrument of coercion and perpetual fighting; therefore, the remedy begins with the structure of revelation and disciplined historical interpretation, which prevents religion from being turned into violence. From this premise, the author concludes that the Muhammadan message is aligned with freedom and mercy and rejects coercion and tyranny, as in the Qur’anic message establishes freedom and rejects coercion and coercive religious authority. He then redefines fighting, jihad, apostasy, allegiance, and disavowal within a defensive, humanistic, and pluralistic horizon, as shown in Qur’anic fighting is defensive and bounded, and the historical context prevents the legitimization of terrorism and human association in the Qur’an is based on mutual recognition and work, not on exclusion and enmity, and he completes this with precise linguistic and purposive tools in tools of linguistic and purposive understanding that expand the moral meaning of the text.