Al-Baqarah 282

7 min read

This verse recurs in Shahrur’s project because, for him, it represents the clearest model of regulation in transactions and of preserving rights through writing and testimony. It is central to his thought because it shows how documentation is built upon precision and justice, rather than impression or laxity.

The Text of the Verse as Cited

O you who believe, when you contract a debt for a specified term, write it down … and call upon two witnesses from among your men …

Reader’s Answer

Question

How does Muhammad Shahrur employ the Debt Verse (al-Baqarah 282) in his reading?

In the available evidence, Shahrur employs the verse to establish a specific meaning for the verb “kataba”: here, it means writing down and recording. He relies on the verse’s commands to write down the debt until its term, for the scribe to write justly, and not to tire of writing down the debt, whether small or large. Thus, the connection of the verse to Shahrur’s reading as established in this context concerns documenting a financial transaction in writing, rather than constructing a complete theory of testimony or of the equality of women’s and men’s testimony.

Shahrur presents al-Baqarah 282 as an example of how “kataba” can mean writing down and recording. The evidence connects this meaning to the context of deferred debt: the command to write it down, the presence of a scribe acting justly, and the writing down of the debt, small or large, until its term.

Evidence and Location

Drying Up the Sources of Terrorism — p. 59.

Limits of the Reading

  • The available evidence is quoted from Drying Up the Sources of Terrorism, not from the book Islam and Humanity mentioned in the description of usage.
  • The evidence does not interpret the term “shahīd” as the person present who hears and sees the contract.
  • The evidence does not address the question of the number of witnesses, the meaning of “two women,” or the equality of women’s and men’s testimony. It is therefore not valid to attribute these conclusions to Shahrur here on its basis.
  • The evidence does not establish an independent juristic ruling on the obligation to write or on the exception for immediate trade; rather, it cites the verse to identify the meaning of “kataba.”

Continue from Here

Brief Reading

Shahrur uses the verse to highlight that religion preserves financial rights through writing and attestation, and that testimony in it is testimony of presence and direct observation of the contract. He also works through the details of its wording in order to assign the terms a precise function in documentation and in preventing diminution.

Axes

  • Legislative
  • Methodological
  • Linguistic and semantic
  • Testimony: 3
  • Financial right: 2
  • Writing: 2
  • Documentation: 2
  • Giving testimony: 2
  • Transactional testimony: 1
  • Right: 1
  • Decisive verses: 1
  • Summons and testimony: 1

Its Place in the Network of Concepts

The verse is connected to testimony, documentation, writing, and financial rights. It is central because it gives his project a practical model for reading rulings in light of preserving rights, and links language with justice in transactions.

The Verse’s Role in the Argument

  • Support: 4
  • Foundation: 3
  • Example: 2
  • Distinction: 1

Summary of Its Presence in the Atlas

  • A model of writing and testimony in transactions.
  • Connected to the preservation of financial rights.
  • Provides his reading with an example of the precision of documentation.

Contexts of Use

  • Islam and Humanity: He makes it an example that the shahīd is the person present who hears and sees the contract, and also derives from it the equality of women’s and men’s testimony in a particular historical context.
    • Concept: Transactional testimony
    • Function of the verse here: Support
    • Textual evidence: “We find this clear in His, exalted be He, saying: {O you who believe, when you contract a debt … and call upon two witnesses from among your men …} (al-Baqarah 282).”
  • Islam and Faith, p. 77: He uses it to affirm the prevention of loss and diminution in transactions as part of the system of justice.
    • Concept: Right
    • Function of the verse here: Support
    • Textual evidence: “{… and let him not diminish anything from it …} (al-Baqarah 282).”
  • Islam and Faith, p. 77: He uses it to affirm the necessity of not reducing rights in documented transactions.
    • Concept: Financial right
    • Function of the verse here: Support
    • Textual evidence: “- {… and let the one upon whom the right rests dictate, and let him fear God, his Lord, and not diminish anything from it …} (al-Baqarah 282).”
  • the Book and the Qur’an, p. 43: He presents it as a practical example of the verses of messengerhood that he includes within the Mother of the Book.
    • Concept: Decisive verses
    • Function of the verse here: Example
    • Textual evidence: “An example of the decisive verses is His, exalted be He, saying in Surat al-Baqarah 282, beginning with {O you who believe} and ending with {And God is Knowing of all things}.”
  • Drying Up the Sources of Terrorism, p. 19: He mentions it as an example of the meaning of “kataba” as writing down and recording, rather than legislation in the juristic sense of obligation.
    • Concept: Writing
    • Function of the verse here: Example
    • Textual evidence: “- {O you who believe, when you contract a debt for a specified term, write it down …} (al-Baqarah 282)”
  • Drying Up the Sources of Terrorism, p. 57: He makes it a basis for in-person testimony in contracts and buying and selling, rather than for the concept of one killed in battle.
    • Concept: Documentation
    • Function of the verse here: Foundation
    • Textual evidence: “{And call upon two witnesses from among your men …} (al-Baqarah 282).”
  • Drying Up the Sources of Terrorism, p. 59: He cites it as evidence that the function of witnesses is to give living testimony when summoned, not to die in battle.
    • Concept: Giving testimony
    • Function of the verse here: Support
    • Textual evidence: “Thus, the duty of the witnesses is His, exalted be He, saying: {And let not the witnesses refuse when they are summoned} (al-Baqarah 282).”
  • Drying Up the Sources of Terrorism, p. 295: He cites it as evidence for distinguishing the present shahīd from the expert shāhid, connecting both to the context of contracting and proof.
    • Concept: Testimony
    • Function of the verse here: Foundation
    • Textual evidence: “Whoever is present and hears a sales contract between two contracting parties is a shahīd, not a shāhid, according to His, exalted be He, saying: {And call upon two witnesses …} (al-Baqarah 282).”
  • Guide to the Contemporary Reading of the Wise Revelation, p. 67: He distinguishes between the shahīd present at an event and the expert shāhid who infers the report.
    • Concept: Testimony
    • Function of the verse here: Distinction
    • Textual evidence: “Whoever is present and hears a sales contract between two contracting parties is a shahīd, not a shāhid, according to His saying: { … and call upon two witnesses from among your men … } (al-Baqarah 282).”
  • Toward New Foundations for Islamic Jurisprudence, pp. 60, 78: He builds on it a semantic rule that “idhā mā” indicates the negation of permission and excuse—that is, the obligation of witnesses to respond when summoned.
    • Concept: Summons and testimony
    • Function of the verse here: Foundation
    • Textual evidence: “So it was revealed: {And let not the witnesses refuse when they are summoned} (al-Baqarah 282) … The function of ‘mā’ here is to negate permission and excuse.”

This page is presented within the general atlas construction methodology.

Graph View

Backlinks1

Muhammad Shahrur Atlas