Intended Meaning
The true prohibition belongs to God alone, and neither the jurist nor the council nor parliament has the right to impose a prohibition or permissibility of their own devising. This statement is based on distinguishing between divine legislation and human authority in rulings.
The Atom’s Structure in the Atlas
- Type of argument: legislative
- Direction of argument: restricts prohibition to God alone.
- Key terms: prohibition, God, jurist, parliament.
- Degree of centrality: primary.
This atom establishes that prohibition is not a human authority, but a purely divine ruling, and thus limits the expansion of the jurist or institution in inventing prohibition.
Links that help with reading
- Muhammad Shahrur Islam and Faith
- Legislation, Limits, and Prohibition
- prohibition
- God
- Legislation in Shahrur distinguishes between the divine forbidden and human ijtihad
Basis
- Supporting text: «True prohibition belongs to God alone; no jurist, council, or parliament has the right to impose a prohibition or permissibility of their own devising».
Location of the basis in the book
- Book: Islam and Faith.
- Location: near the beginning of the book, within the discussion of the relationship between religion and authority.
- Type of basis: close witness.
- Marker that helps verification: the distinction between Islam and faith
- Reading note: This passage is suitable because it links prohibition to an exclusive divine right and denies humans any monopoly over it, which is the core of the atom.
Degree of documentation
- Level: directly documented
- Meaning of the level: the atom relies on an explicit witness close to the wording of the claim.
- Limits of reading: the formulation above is an analytical summary and should not be treated as a verbatim quotation unless the witness is transmitted word for word.
Its function in the book
Its function here is declarative; it establishes a result on which what follows in the line of argument depends.
Related to
Editorial note
This atom is foundational in criticizing legislative monopoly.