What is meant

The author links the historical emergence of the Kharijites to the political conflict that followed the killing of Uthman. Their breakaway was not a purely religious event, but came in the context of a struggle over power and the ensuing division.

The atom’s structure in the atlas

  • Type of argument: Historical
  • Direction of the argument: Returns the emergence of the Kharijites to the political conflict after the killing of Uthman.
  • Key terms: Kharijites, political conflict, killing of Uthman, division, power.
  • Degree of centrality: Secondary.

It explains the emergence of the Kharijites as the result of a power struggle turning into a historical split, which softens readings that isolate the phenomenon from its political and social conditions.

Grounding

  • Supporting text: «It links the historical emergence of the “Kharijites” to the political conflict after the killing of Uthman».

Place of the grounding in the book

  • Book: Religion and Authority.
  • Location: Near the beginning of the book within the critique of the political attribution of hadiths.
  • Type of grounding: Close witness.
  • Marker that helps verification: the political attribution of hadiths
  • Reading note: The location is close because it mentions the emergence of the Kharijites in the context of prophecies and fabricated hadiths serving the political struggle.

Degree of documentation

  • Level: Directly documented
  • Meaning of the level: The atom rests on an explicit witness close to the formulation of the claim.
  • Limits of the reading: The formulation above is an analytical summary, and is not treated as a verbatim quotation unless the witness is cited verbatim.

Its function in the book

Its function here is declarative; it establishes a result on which what follows in the argument depends.

Editorial note

This atom is useful for reinterpreting the beginnings of religious violence in Islamic history.