Intended Meaning
The author holds that inherited jurisprudence was suitable for the time in which it emerged and for its specific circumstances, but it is not fit for application in the twenty-first century. Therefore, he calls for not dealing with it as though it were a valid framework, as is, for the present
The Atom’s Structure in the Atlas
- Type of argument: Critical
- Movement of the argument: The inherited jurisprudence cannot be relied upon in the present as it is.
- Central terms: inherited jurisprudence, time, present, application.
- Degree of centrality: Central.
It negates the validity of inherited jurisprudence as a ready-made framework for the present time, and pushes toward reconsidering its suitability under different conditions.
Links That Help with Reading
- Muhammad Shahrur Um al-Kitab and Its Elaboration
- Critique of Heritage, Jurisprudence, and Exegesis
- The Limited Divine Prohibition Negates the Prophet’s Legislative Independence
Basis
- Supporting text: «Inherited jurisprudence was suitable for its time and circumstances, but it is not fit for application in the twenty-first century».
Degree of Documentation
- Level: Directly documented
- Meaning of the level: The atom relies on an explicit witness close to the formulation of the claim.
- Limits of reading: The wording above is an analytical summary, and should not be treated as a verbatim quotation unless the witness is quoted textually.
Its Function in the Book
Its function here is argumentative; it supports a larger conclusion in the chapter or prepares the ground for it.
Related to
Editorial Note
The atom is a direct critique of extending old jurisprudence into the present.