Muhammad is understood here as the messenger who conveys, not an independent legislator. His obedience has two dimensions: one tied to revelation and one historical, tied to his human context, which is consistent with restricting prohibition and legislation to God alone.
- The verse on adultery targets public indecency
- Obedience to the Messenger has two forms
- Prayer as a relationship differs from the rite
- Punishments are legal limits subject to regulation
- Qur’anic legislation requires contextual specification
- Retaliation belongs to the civil system
- The straight path means free ethical commitment
- The verse on theft means deterrence, not amputation
- Worship is voluntary submission to God
- The Mother of the Book verses explain the prohibitions
- The detailing verses establish the rulings of the message
- The detailing verses clarify the prohibitions
- The detailing verses explain the prohibitions
- Consuming wealth unjustly includes bribery
- The Mother of the Book is the basis of the Muhammadan message
- The Mother of the Book establishes a limit-based and civil legislation that restricts prohibition and frees ijtihad
- The Mother of the Book is the clear verses
- The Mother of the Book and its detailing present a project for rebuilding the understanding of the Qur’an, religion, and legislation on contemporary foundations
- Reclassifying the Book and the Mother of the Book organizes the structure and functions of the Qur’anic text
- The detailed rulings are open to practical ijtihad
- Rulings have a divine and a human dimension
- Terrorism means legitimate deterrence
- Ijtihad in detailing the clear verses
- Ijtihad pertains to the clear verses
- Attending to the meaning of the texts
- Rational interpretation turns the unseen into knowledge consistent with reality
- Rational interpretation rebuilds the unseen and religion on the basis of freedom and knowledge
- Interpretation froze intellectual development
- Interpretation is specific to the ambiguous verses
- Interpretation is the cause of disagreement
- Interpretation pertains to the ambiguous verses
- Liberation from traditional jurisprudence
- Restricted divine prohibition negates the Messenger’s legislative independence
- Prohibition is a purely divine prerogative
- Prohibition in Islam → restricted
- Synonymy is at the root of the traditional confusion
- Limit-based legislation makes application variable within the constants of the Mother of the Book
- Contemporary civil legislation
- Legislation changes as society changes
- Legislation responds to changing reality
- Detailing is based on a methodological distinction
- Distinguishing between the clear verses and the detailing
- Distinguishing between the clear and the ambiguous distributes ijtihad and interpretation methodically
- The Wise Revelation is a living, interactive text
- The Wise Revelation is a living text that requires a contemporary reading beyond traditional rigidity
- Revelation is an epistemic stage, not merely rhetoric
- Traditional rigidity is the cause of marginalization
- Jihad is broader than fighting
- The forbidden is limited to what God has forbidden
- Report is linked to presence and direct witnessing
- Wine and gambling are prohibited, not declared forbidden
- Religion is a free relation with God that distinguishes between the historical message and ethical commitment
- Usury is forbidden because it harms the debtor
- The Muhammadan message is boundary-based and universal
- The Messenger is a conveyor, not a lawgiver
- Zakat is a distributive social duty
- Associating partners with God is the first of the prohibitions
- Rites fall under the detailing
- Qur’anic punishments are civil limits subject to regulation, not fixed bodily procedures
- Indecency includes both the outward and the inward
- Traditional jurisprudence is not contemporary legislation
- Inherited jurisprudence is not fit for the present
- Understanding changes according to the problem at hand
- Legitimate fighting repels aggression
- Euthanasia differs from suicide
- The Qur’an is structurally reclassified
- The contemporary reading dismantles the traditional intermediary layer
- The contemporary reading requires a new interpretive method that goes beyond traditional exegesis
- A systematic reading of the text gathers the verses and reorders the detailing around interpretation
- Qur’anic narratives are for moral lesson, not legislation
- Qur’anic narratives belong to the epistemic dimension, not legislation
- The Book and the Qur’an are distinct
- The Qurayshi tongue and the reclassification of the Book establish a precise semantic structure for the text
- The Qurayshi tongue and the unity of the text support a non-synonymous linguistic project of knowledge
- The clear verse does not admit ijtihad
- The clear and the ambiguous each have their own detailing
- The clear verses do not admit ijtihad
- The customary and the objectionable change socially
- The report becomes a report through interpretation
- The report pertains to the unseen
- The descent occurred in the Quraysh dialect
- The text was revealed in the tongue of Quraysh
- Revelation does not contradict reason and reality
- The traditional classificatory system became inflated
- Detailing the clear verse is the field of ijtihad
- Gathering the verses to understand the clear text
- Restricting the prohibitions protects against manipulation
- Disobedience to one’s parents is forbidden
- The traditional Qur’anic sciences arose historically and then became intermingled under the dominance of exegesis
- The aim of revelation is to elevate language into knowledge
- Killing children for fear of destitution is forbidden
- Killing children for fear of poverty
- Killing oneself is forbidden except by right
- The Arabic tongue is Qurayshi in character
- Women’s dress is a matter of custom
- The Quraysh dialect is closer to eloquence
- Orphan’s property may be approached only in the best way
- The Qur’anic sciences arose historically
- The dominance of exegesis