What Is Attributed to Shahrur
The record attributes to Shahrur a distinction between a general justice suitable for everyone and a special justice that requires taking into account the specific circumstances of a family. This is the substance of the available evidence: a paraphrase associated with episode 26, not a documented quotation from it.
Atlas Explanation
General justice, in this account, points to a single rule that can be applied to everyone. Consideration of a particular family, however, concerns examining how its circumstances differ from those of others. This does not entail invalidating the general rule; rather, it indicates that its generality does not necessarily settle every individual family case.
Synthetic Conclusion
In its editorial construction, the atom is connected to the subjects of bequest and inheritance, but the available material does not provide a documented text sufficient to establish an ordering between them or to explain their respective functions in special cases. This connection should therefore remain at the level of thematic reference, not documented assertion.
Open Question and Documentation Limits
What terms did Shahrur use in episode 26 to define “general justice” and “special justice”? And does he explicitly connect them to bequest and inheritance? The original episode and the relevant passages in Towards New Foundations for Islamic Jurisprudence and The Mother of the Book and Its Elaboration must be consulted before reaching a firm conclusion.