Source location: الحلقة 24: نموذج المدينة وبنو قريظة وتطبيق الشريعة على أهلها, at 05:49–05:54. Audible witness: «نطوق الحكم لانه هذا مو شريعتي هي مو شريعتي هي شريعتهم خاصه انه سعد كان».
What the Claim Means Here
This record does not present an independent historical judgment on the incident. Rather, it documents an interpretation attributed to Shahrur: that the judgment carried out concerning Banu Qurayza is not read, in this interpretation, as an application of Islamic law to them, but as an application of their own law in the context of warfare at that time.
What Is Attributed to Shahrur
The material offers a paraphrase to the effect that “what occurred with Banu Qurayza was not an application of Islamic law to them, but an application of their own law as wars were conducted according to their legal logic at that time.” Accordingly, the scope of the documented claim is the attributed distinction Shahrur makes between Islamic law and the law said to have been applied to Banu Qurayza in that incident.
Atlas Explanation
This record should be treated as a preliminary evidence record rather than final documentation. The available material is a paraphrase marked as requiring review and contains neither a verbatim quotation nor raw context. Therefore, this page does not attribute to Shahrur details not established by the evidence presented.
Synthetic Conclusion
If the reference is confirmed from the original recording, the distinction attributed here limits how the incident may be read: it should not automatically be turned into a general Islamic legal ruling. This is an inference from the limits of the claim itself, not a documented statement of further details about the incident.
Open Question and Documentation Limits
Does the original recording explain the criterion for attributing the judgment to “their law,” and the source of this characterization? Does Shahrur connect this to referring the judgment to Sa‘d ibn Mu‘adh, or to a specific idea about the Sunna and legislation? The available evidence does not answer these questions. It is necessary to consult the original episode and then the relevant books, including State and Society, Religion and Authority, and Drying Up the Sources of Terrorism.