This page explains a conceptual relation between two terms within Shahrur’s thought, and how this relation functions in the construction of meaning.
Within a broader family
This relation falls within the field of the function of the Qur’anic narratives in Shahrur’s thought. Its witness shows a specific aspect, while the family brings together admonition, knowledge, and the uncovering of historical laws, alongside the negation of turning narratives into a direct source of legislation.
Meaning of the relation
This relation means that the Qur’anic narratives are understood as a text that directs the reader toward reflection and the acquisition of knowledge through its events, scenes, and indications, not as a source for legislation and the derivation of rulings. Their position here is that of cognitive and educational guidance, where admonition is sought from them, not a legislative function.
The two sides of the relation
- The first side: the Qur’anic narratives
- The relation: perform the function of admonition and knowledge
- The second side: not a function of legislation
Evidence
- Mother of the Book and Its Elaboration through The Qur’anic narratives fall within the cognitive dimension, not within legislation
- Witness: The Qur’anic narratives fall within the cognitive dimension, not within legislation specifies the Qur’anic narratives as for admonition, not legislation, locating the narratives within the Qur’anic structure as a field of reflection, not of deriving rulings
Its effect on the cognitive map
This relation acquires its importance because it determines the place of the Qur’anic narratives within the Qur’anic structure in a way that prevents confusion between the domain of knowledge and the domain of legislation. In doing so, it helps draw a more precise conceptual map of the contents of the Qur’an, and clarifies that some parts play a role in forming consciousness and admonition, not in producing rulings, thereby preserving the distinction of functions within the Qur’anic system.