This index gathers the structure within Religion and Power and links it to the index of claims.
Structure pages
- Filial piety is an innate value, and punishment in it is subject to the شرعي limits
- The Islamic heritage has become a standard instead of remaining material for study
- Jihad begins with speech and ends in violence when there is blockage
- Divine sovereignty is a stage of direct domination
- Sovereignty belongs to God means that prohibition is confined to revelation and humans are barred from adding prohibitions
- Sovereignty is a modern political concept
- Religious and political freedom are conditions for worship and jihad
- Freedom is action and conduct
- The conflation of religion and authority produced coercion
- Wine and gambling are forbidden, not prohibited, because prohibition in revelation is exclusive
- Internal and external dimensions in resisting occupation
- The constitution is civil, and legislation is the prerogative of the elected
- The civil state is the opposite of political, religious, and financial tyranny
- Islamic religion accords with nature, and freedom is the basis of the human being
- Religion and authority are two distinct domains
- Religion is based on voluntariness and does not conflict with civil society
- The Muhammadan message establishes independent reasoning
- The fourth authority is the authority of society
- Jihadi Salafism arises from a blending of Qutbist and Wahhabi tendencies
- The false deity and coercive authority
- Tyranny is an intertwined network that requires comprehensive resistance
- Worship consists of fixed rites outside political legislation, and there is no compulsion in it
- Jurisprudence is historical, and civil law is separate from it
- Civil society safeguards creativity and labor because legislation is changeable
- Qur’anic prohibitions are fixed, whereas prohibition is left to human reasoning
- Mawdudi formulates a confrontational binary
- Abrogation occurs between messages
- Renaissance requires a break with epistemic tyranny
- National loyalty requires defending the homeland
- The dhimmi category is no longer suitable as a basis for the modern state
- The distinction between religion, authority, and the state leads to a state founded on its material elements rather than on coercion
- Haj Hamad تجاوزs the confrontational binary
- Pharaoh, Haman, and Qarun are models of the structure of tyranny
- Qur’anic narratives are read as historical laws
- Qutb turns sovereignty into a takfiri ideology